4/2004 Reconciliation through the Past: Pan-European Perspective

Куда же идет антисталинизм

Кэтлин Смит

4/2004

Публикуется на английском (на английской части сайта).

SUMMARY:

В своей статье Катлин Смит рассматривает проблему отношения к советскому прошлому и, в частности, к сталинизму в контексте политического развития от перестройки до В. Путина. Смит отмечает изменение отношения к связи истории и идеологии в постсоветский период в России и трудности, связанные с установлением общественного консенсуса о природе нового государства и общества. Рассматривая постельцинскую эпоху, Смит анализирует мотивацию и пути выработки нормализованного образа советского прошлого в новом нарративе государственности.

Доступ

Оформите подписку, чтобы получить полный доступ к текстам

Оформить подписку

Read in English

Сноски

1.Quotations are from: Patrick E. Tyler. Soviet Hymn is Back, Creating Much Discord // New York Times. 2000. December 6. P. A1; Nina Andreeva. Ne mogu postupat’sia printsipami // Sovetskaia Rossiia. 1988. March 13.↩

2.For a fascinating analysis of individual motivations for pro-democracy sentiments, Alexander Lukin. The Political Culture of the Russian “Democrats”. Oxford, 2000.↩

3.On the decline of the Memorial Society, see: Kathleen E. Smith. Remembering Stalin’s Victims. Popular Memory and the End of the USSR. Ithaca, NY, 1996.↩

4.Printsipy perestroiki. Revoliutsionnost’ myshleniia i deistvii // Pravda. April 5. 1988.↩

5.Cited by Serge Schmemann. Yeltsin Extols 1921 Rebellion // New York Times. 1994. January 11. P. 3.↩

6.Cited in Lee Hockstader. Politics in the Aftermyth of War // Washington Post. 1996. May 10. P. A32.↩

7.For liberal mythologizing about the war, see: Evgenii Aleksandrov. Nastoiashchii prazdnik ne otmenit nikto. 9 maia – Den’ pobedy // Nezavisimaia Gazeta. 1994. May 7. P. 1; Otto Latsis. My ne zabudem, kto bral Berlin, dazhe esli komu-to ne khochetsia ob etom vspominat’ // Izvestiia.1994. May 7. P. 1.↩

8.Evgenii Krasnikov. Oppozitsiia // Nezavisimaia Gazeta.1995. May 11. P. 1.↩

9.Speech of April 9, 1996, reproduced in: Obshcherossiiskoe dvizhenie obshchestvennoi podderzhki B. N. El’tsina na vyborakh Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moscow, 1996. Pp. 5-20. Quote p. 6.↩

10.Interview with Filatov // Vercherniaia Moskva.1996. June 9.↩

11.B. El’tsin. Vmeste – my pobedim! // Rossiiskaia Gazeta. 1996. June 18.↩

12.El’tsin o nasional’noi idee // Nezavisimaia Gazeta.1996. July 13. P. 1.↩

13.Regarding awareness of the need to translate ideas into “a language of images, metaphors,” see: Aleksandr Rubtsov. V ozhidanii idei // Nezavisimaia Gazeta.1997. November 4. P. 5; see also Michael Urban’s discussion of “technologies of discourse” which shape the social world by establishing the ensemble of words, expressions and symbols that can be meaningfully communicated about it. Michael Urban. Remythologising the Russian State // Europe-Asia Studies. 1998. Vol. 50. No 6. P. 969.↩

14.Georgii Satarov cited in David Remnick. Hammer, Sickle, and Book // New York Review of Books. 1996. May 23. P. 46; see also: Viacheslav Kostikov. Vremia vlastvovat’ postupkami // Moskovskie Novosti. 1996. September 22-29. P. 28.↩

15.Iurii Grechishkin. Akh muzhik, davai poobshchaemsia! // Rossiiskaia Gazeta. 1996. September 10. P. 3; Valentin Miloserdov. Vsiu zhizn’ ia byl kulach’em nedobitym // Ibid. 1996. December 19. P. 3; Aleksei Firsanov. Ne putaite imperiiu chuvstv, bankov ili sala s velikoi derzhavoj // Ibid. 1996. December 5. P. 5; Vladimir Mordashev. My, konechno, ne amerikantsy. No ne glupee zhe ikh // Ibid. 1996. September 17. P. 5.↩

16.Aleksei Kiva. Blesk i nishcheta // Rossiiskaia Gazeta. 1997. February 20. P. 5; 1997. February 21. Pp. 4, 5. For another typical attack on the role of dissidents in contemporary Russia, see: Viktoria Sharinova. Pravozashchitniki i sovremennaia Rossiia // Segodnia. 1996. August 17. P. 10.↩

17.Vladimir Putin. Lozung “kolbasa i svoboda!” ne mozhet byt’ natsional’noi ideei // Izvestiia. 1999. September 2. P. 1.↩

18.Yegor Ligachev. Inside Gorbachev’s Kremlin / Trans. Catherine A. Fitzpatrick, Michele A. Berdy, and Dorochna Dyrcz-Freeman. New York, 1993. P. 285.↩

19.Cited in Patrick Lannin. Yeltsin Derides Anthem Proposal as Vote Looms // Moscow Times. December 8, 2000. P. 4.↩

20.Ibid.↩

21.J. Samuel Valenzuela. Democratic Consolidation in Post-Transitional Settings. Notion, Process, and Facilitating Conditions // Scott Mainwaring, Guillermo O’Donnell and J. Samuel Valenzuela (Eds.). Issues in Democratic Consolidation. Notre Dame, 1992. Pp. 78-80.↩

22.Vladimir Voinovich. I moi gimn // Izvestiia. 2000. December 7. P. 1.↩

Примечания

[1]Quotations are from: Patrick E. Tyler. Soviet Hymn is Back, Creating Much Discord // New York Times. 2000. December 6. P. A1; Nina Andreeva. Ne mogu postupat’sia printsipami // Sovetskaia Rossiia. 1988. March 13.

[2]For a fascinating analysis of individual motivations for pro-democracy sentiments, Alexander Lukin. The Political Culture of the Russian “Democrats”. Oxford, 2000.

[3]On the decline of the Memorial Society, see: Kathleen E. Smith. Remembering Stalin’s Victims. Popular Memory and the End of the USSR. Ithaca, NY, 1996.

[4]Printsipy perestroiki. Revoliutsionnost’ myshleniia i deistvii // Pravda. April 5. 1988.

[5]Cited by Serge Schmemann. Yeltsin Extols 1921 Rebellion // New York Times. 1994. January 11. P. 3.

[6]Cited in Lee Hockstader. Politics in the Aftermyth of War // Washington Post. 1996. May 10. P. A32.

[7]For liberal mythologizing about the war, see: Evgenii Aleksandrov. Nastoiashchii prazdnik ne otmenit nikto. 9 maia – Den’ pobedy // Nezavisimaia Gazeta. 1994. May 7. P. 1; Otto Latsis. My ne zabudem, kto bral Berlin, dazhe esli komu-to ne khochetsia ob etom vspominat’ // Izvestiia.1994. May 7. P. 1.

[8]Evgenii Krasnikov. Oppozitsiia // Nezavisimaia Gazeta.1995. May 11. P. 1.

[9]

Ab Imperio

Ab Imperio

Куда же идет антисталинизм

Примечания